Thursday, 17 May 2012

Critical Thinking Essay #4

Legalising Euthanasia


Should people cheated death instead of suffering? Euthanasia is the term of terminating a very sick person in order to relieve them from suffering. At the same time, euthanasia can be done under request of the person suffering, yet, there are times when the person who suffers couldn’t make the request for examples, people in coma and paralysed the decision to do euthanasia is made by the relatives, the medics, or other instances. Moreover, euthanasia is mostly done to people who suffer from incurable sickness, and most people would think that euthanasia is mostly done to the people who suffered pain awfully, however, the statistics from USA and Netherlands shows that “less than a third of request for euthanasia were because of severe pain.” In other words, psychological factors such as depression, feeling a burden, and dislike of being dependent are the cause that makes people to think of euthanasia. For this reason, there are some countries that don’t support the act of euthanasia because it is against the religion, it is not humanist, and it against the law because euthanasia also called suicide or kill. Nonetheless, the ethical problems of euthanasia and the facts that supports euthanasia will shows why euthanasia should be legalise.

Euthanasia should be legalised because of several morality or ethical reasons. In general, those civilised people argued that the act of euthanasia or suicide should not be a crime because they believe that everyone has the rights of their own bodies and mind which is means that they have the rights to make their own decision to live or to die. Moreover, they believe that forcing people to continue living and suffering is immoral. In fact, the act of euthanasia is illegal in most of the countries including the Britain. According to the 1961 Suicide Act, euthanasia is consider a crime in Britain, and the punishment is 14 years of imprisonment, to assist, aid or counsel somebody to taking their own life. And besides, the Times (24 January 2007) stated that, according to the British Social Attitudes survey in 2007, “80% of the public said that they wanted the law changed to give terminally ill patients the right to die with a doctor’s help.” And at the same time, in the same survey, it stated, “45% supported giving patients of non-terminal illnesses the option of euthanasia. And a majority opposed to relatives being involved in patient’s death.” As the matter of facts that forcing people to continue living and suffering is immoral and against human rights, the act of euthanasia should be allowed and legalised.

Furthermore, euthanasia should be allowed and legalise because of the logical facts of the act of euthanasia. First of all, as it mentioned in the paragraph above, people have the rights to control their own bodies, mind, and life. As it was stated in The Independent (March, 2002), “in cases where there are no dependants who might exert pressure way or the other, the right of the individual to choose should be paramount. So long as the patient is lucid, and his or her intent is clear beyond doubt, here need be no further question.” Second of all, death is a private matters, and if it is not harmful to others the state and other people have no right to interfere. As an example, if an action promotes the best interest of everyone concerned and violates no one’s rights then that action is morally acceptable, and which is means, euthanasia is morally acceptable because euthanasia promotes the best interests of everyone involved and it violae’s no one’s rights. And last but not least, euthanasia could be necessary for the fair distribution of health resources. For instance, in some countries, there is a lack of health resources and sometimes some people who are ill of sickness that can be cured can’t get the fast access and treatment because all the equipments are being use to the person whom the sickness can’t be cured. And thus, by allowing some people to commit euthanasia help people who are in needs and want to stay alive from the valuable resources. Therefore, the act of euthanasia shouldn’t be banned and illegal because this act affects the society positively and people live and death is their own rights to choose.

To conclude, as a human being, people would prefer end their own life in dignity and painless rather than suffering and waiting until the time to come. At the same time, killing people under request or because of helping people to relieve their suffering does not count as crime, because they do something bad for good. Therefore, euthanasia should be legalise because it doesn’t affects other people, it does not against human rights, and it is an individual meters to make their own decisions.

Work Cited


BBC - Ethics - Euthanasia: Ethical problems of euthanasia. (n.d.). BBC - Homepage. Retrieved May 16, 2012, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/euthanasia/overview/problems.shtml
BBC - Ethics - Euthanasia: Pro-euthanasia arguments. (n.d.). BBC - Homepage. Retrieved May 16, 2012, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/euthanasia/infavour/infavour_1.shtml

Friday, 11 May 2012

Critical Thinking Essay #3

Pros and Cons of Capital Punishment



Is Death the way to solve problems? As stated by the Britannica Encyclopedia, capital punishment is also called the death penalty which is means an execution of a criminal sentenced to death after a conviction by a court of law of a criminal offense. However, some people commited crime because they have resons such as self-defense and these people will need to be consider again before just putting them into death penalty. Besides, there always have the pros and cons of this capital punishment.

To strat with, there are several pros of doing capital punishment. First of all, prison is the place to rehabilitate convicts who will eventually leave prisons. Logically, people who are rehabilitating in prison are less likely going to repeat their crimes and sentenced in prison again, yet, for people who are not supposed to be release from the prison alive, death penalty will be the best way to execute them. Second of all, capital punishment is truly cost effective to the government. Lucidly, the cost of imprisoning a person for his or her whole life is lots more expensive then just executing the same person in a time. Third of all or lastly, capital punushment will make the security of the public to be more assured. For example, normally, people who are sentenced to capital punishment are people who commited in a big crime and they usually are a violent individuals. And these people might harm the prison’s guard or other prisoners. At the same time, they might ran away and it harmfull to the general public as well. Therefore, by giving capital punishment to a violent individual will make the society to become more secure, and subsequently it will help to safe lots of money compared to imprisoning criminals for ther whole life.

On the other hand, there are quite a few cons to do the capital punishment. Firstly, capital punishment is not humane because killing a person is not humane. Even though the criminal is not humane, but everyone’s beliefs and education had taught them about what is humane and what’s right to do and what’s wrong to do. Secondly, Some people belief that the death penalty violates the human rights. They believe that killing them or death is the violation of the person’s rights to live. Lastly, some people believe that killing and capital punishment is playing God. Some people believe that all death has to be natural and murder is one part of a nature death. Thus, the cons of doing the capital punishment will includes morality and beliefs of individuals because some people believe that death penalty is not humane, it against human rights to live, and it’s changing the natural death or also called playing with God’s plan.


In conclusion, there are always being the pros and cons of the capital punishment because kiling is against the morality of human and people knows that two wrong do not make a right. In contrast, keeping a criminal will affect the society’ssecurity as well. In my opnion, convicting person to the death penalty may need to stated clear information of the person criminal records. At the same time, before conviting a person, the court will have to look for reasons and backgrounds of the criminal and reconsider wether execution is needed or not. Thus, clear and solid evidence is the best way to tell wether a person need to be executed or not becase without strong evidence and clear reasons killing a person is still consider a crime and it againts the human rights.






Work Cited

B., P. (n.d.). The Pros and Cons of Capital Punishment « Phil for Humanity. Phil for Humanity. Retrieved May 10, 2012, from http://www.philforhumanity.com/Capital_Punishment.html
HIll, G. N., & Hill, K. T. (n.d.). capital punishment legal definition of capital punishment. capital punishment synonyms by the Free Online Law Dictionary.. Legal Dictionary. Retrieved May 11, 2012, from http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/capital+punishment
Kartha, D. (n.d.). Pros and Cons of Capital Punishment. Buzzle. Retrieved May 11, 2012, from http://www.buzzle.com/articles/10-pros-and-cons-of-capital-punishment.html
capital punishment (law) : Introduction -- Britannica Online Encyclopedia. (n.d.). Britannica Online Encyclopedia. Retrieved May 11, 2012, from http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/93902/capital-punishment